Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Urology ; 182: 79-83, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716457

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively analyze the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of women regarding genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and vaginal estrogen therapy as expressed on Reddit, a public, anonymous internet forum for discussion and information sharing. METHODS: "r/menopause," a Subreddit with >30,000 subscribers, was queried for "vaginal estrogen" to collect postings related to vaginal estrogen in October 2022. Posts were analyzed qualitatively by 2 independent researchers. The principles of grounded theory were applied, and preliminary themes were generated. These themes were used to derive emergent concepts. RESULTS: Sixty-seven unique posts with 1101 responses were analyzed. Qualitative analysis revealed 5 preliminary themes: (1) questions regarding medication usage, (2) medication side effects, (3) medication alternatives, (4) frustration with the medical system, and (5) seeking validation for symptoms and experiences. Three emergent concepts were derived: (1) women experience bothersome side effects from menopause, and they desire compassionate and effective medical treatment; (2) women are engaged and active participants in their health and health care decisions; and (3) women perceive that their concerns are not taken seriously and seek validation for their medical conditions. CONCLUSION: Peri- and post-menopausal women have many questions and concerns about the condition of GSM and vaginal estrogen as treatment. They also have a broad range of frustrations including access to health care and questions about the usage of vaginal estrogen. By better understanding patient perspectives, physicians can better meet women's needs and improve care for GSM.


Assuntos
Menopausa , Vagina , Feminino , Humanos , Emoções , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vagina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde
2.
Curr Opin Urol ; 33(3): 187-192, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36862100

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a growing interest in nonantibiotic prevention strategies for recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). Our objective is to provide a focused, pragmatic review of the latest evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Vaginal estrogen is well tolerated and effective for preventing rUTI in postmenopausal women. Cranberry supplements at sufficient doses are effective in preventing uncomplicated rUTI. Methenamine, d -mannose, and increased hydration all have evidence to support their use, although the evidence is of somewhat variable quality. SUMMARY: There is sufficient evidence to recommend vaginal estrogen and cranberry as first-line rUTI prevention strategies, particularly in postmenopausal women. Prevention strategies can be used in series or in tandem, based on patient preference and tolerance for side effects, to create effective nonantibiotic rUTI prevention strategies.


Assuntos
Terapias Complementares , Infecções Urinárias , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Metenamina/uso terapêutico , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Recidiva
3.
Urology ; 97: 257-260, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27261182

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review a single institution's 15-year experience with urethral foreign bodies, including evaluation, clinical findings, and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 27 patients comprising 35 episodes of inserted urethral foreign bodies were reviewed at Cook County Hospital between 2000 and 2015. Retrospective chart review was performed to describe the clinical presentation, rationale for insertion, management, recidivism, and sequelae. RESULTS: Median patient age was 26 (range 12-60). Twenty-six patients (97 %) were male, 1 was female (3%). Items inserted included pieces of plastic forks, spoons, metal screws and aluminum, pieces of cardboard or paper, staples, writing utensils such as pens and pencils, as well as coaxial cable and spray foam sealant. Reported reasons for insertion were self-stimulation, erectile enhancement, and attention seeking. Presenting symptoms included dysuria, gross hematuria, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, and penile discharge. The most common technique for removal was manual extraction with extrinsic pressure (n = 19, 54%). Other methods include endoscopic retrieval (n = 8, 23%), open cystotomy (n = 1, 3%), and voiding to expel the foreign body (n = 7, 20%). Postremoval complications included urinary tract infection (n = 7), sepsis (n = 4), urethral false passage (n = 5), laceration (n = 5), and stricture (n = 1). CONCLUSION: We present the largest single-institutional series of urethral foreign bodies to date. Urethral foreign body insertion is a relatively rare occurrence and, commonly, is a recurrent behavior. Urethral trauma related to foreign body insertion is associated with significant risk of infection and urethral injury with long-term sequelae.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos/psicologia , Corpos Estranhos/terapia , Uretra , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Corpos Estranhos/complicações , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lacerações/etiologia , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ereção Peniana , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autoestimulação , Sepse/etiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Endourol ; 27(8): 1051-4, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23590526

RESUMO

The sequelae from forgotten stents carry significant morbidity and costs. In this study, we attempt to identify potential risk factors that may make patients less likely to follow up for stent removal so that more effective prevention efforts may be directed at these persons. A single-institution retrospective analysis of 187 consecutive patients who had stents placed between January 2010 and December 2010 was performed. Chart review was conducted to see if patients had undergone stent removal beyond the intended maximal stent life (MSL). Patients who were lost to follow-up were contacted to determine if stents were overdue. Logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors. Of the 187 patients who had stents placed, 147 had the stent removed before MSL and 28 had stents removed after the MSL. Twelve patients could not be contacted and were excluded from the analysis. Within our cohort of 175 patients, 48% were males, 73% were minorities (33% Latino, 30% Black, 8% Asian, and 2% Native American), 39% did not speak English, 79% were unemployed, 73% were uninsured, and 35% were married. Among the patients with forgotten stents, 68% were male, 64% were minorities (32% Latino, 29% Black, 4% Native American, and 0% Asian), 82% were unemployed, 39% did not speak English, 93% were uninsured, and 43% were married. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that uninsured patients (odds ratio [OR], 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-28.2; P value 0.01) and males (OR, 2.8; CI, 1.2-6.8; P=0.02) had statistically significant associations with forgotten stents. Men were 2.8 times more likely to have forgotten stents than females. Patients without health insurance were six times more likely to have forgotten stents than patients with insurance. As efforts are made to prevent forgotten stents, increased attention should be given to these higher-risk patient populations.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Reação a Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Stents , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Reação a Corpo Estranho/epidemiologia , Reação a Corpo Estranho/cirurgia , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
6.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 74(3): 839-44, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23425745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Penetrating external genital injuries, although uncommon, may present complex problems for the urologic and trauma surgeon. A paucity of data exists on the incidence, clinical characteristics, and management outcomes of these injuries because few institutions have the volume to report their experience. METHODS: Penetrating external genital trauma presenting from 2004 to 2011 was retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, operative and nonoperative management, and outcomes were analyzed while validating current guidelines. Surgical management is described in detail, and overall incidence and trends were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 28,459 trauma patients were reviewed, of which 8,076 sustained penetrating injuries and 162 sustained penetrating external genital trauma. Penetrating external genital trauma was 0.57% of all trauma and 2.0% among penetrating trauma. Gunshot wounds accounted for the most common mechanism of injury (93%). Injury to the scrotum occurred in 78% and of these injuries, 63% resulted in a testicular injury, with bilateral testicular injuries occurring in 8%. Testicular reconstruction was performed in 65%. Penile injuries occurred in 28%, and urethral injuries occurred in 13%. For penile injuries, 62% were explored immediately. Urethral injuries were managed by immediate primary urethral repair (43%) or urinary diversion with delayed reconstruction (57%). In total, nonoperative management was performed in 26% of scrotal and 38% of penile injuries. The incidence of penetrating external genital injuries has remained constant during our study period, averaging 20.2 cases per year (R(2) = 0.99). The testicular salvage rate varied from 55% to 75% per year (R(2) = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Penetrating external genital injuries occur at an incidence of 0.57% where scrotal injury from gunshot wounds is the most common form. Testicular preservation is possible in the majority of testicular injuries. Penile injuries were less likely to require surgical exploration compared with scrotal injuries likely because physical examination is better at confirming only superficial injury. Select patients with superficial scrotal or penile injuries may undergo nonoperative management with minimal morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV; epidemiologic study, level IV.


Assuntos
Genitália Masculina/lesões , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Genitália Masculina/cirurgia , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pênis/lesões , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escroto/lesões , Testículo/lesões , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretra/lesões , Ferimentos Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...